Mississippi Valley
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
527  Joyce Chumo JR 21:00
2,019  Winny Tauni JR 22:40
2,222  Winny Tanui JR 22:54
3,259  Jovanna Peterson JR 24:39
3,424  Tamara Gillard SO 25:11
3,496  Savannah Gillard SO 25:29
National Rank #279 of 339
South Region Rank #33 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 31st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Joyce Chumo Winny Tauni Winny Tanui Jovanna Peterson Tamara Gillard Savannah Gillard
MC/Watson Ford Invitational 10/05 1458 21:01 22:29 24:42 25:04 25:28
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/13 1452 20:54 22:44 24:58 25:02 25:11
SWAC Championships 10/29 1477 21:34 23:00 24:15 24:58 25:18
South Region Championships 11/09 20:57 22:50 26:18 26:42





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 31.6 905 0.1 2.0 8.2 19.6 22.4



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Joyce Chumo 0.0% 212.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Joyce Chumo 49.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.5
Winny Tauni 157.1
Winny Tanui 171.6
Jovanna Peterson 253.6
Tamara Gillard 272.0
Savannah Gillard 280.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 2.0% 2.0 28
29 8.2% 8.2 29
30 19.6% 19.6 30
31 22.4% 22.4 31
32 18.1% 18.1 32
33 13.2% 13.2 33
34 8.7% 8.7 34
35 4.8% 4.8 35
36 2.2% 2.2 36
37 0.5% 0.5 37
38 0.2% 0.2 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0